Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Quizzes for Business > Finance

Behavioral Economics Knowledge Test Quiz

Sharpen Your Behavioral Economics Skills Today

Difficulty: Moderate
Questions: 20
Learning OutcomesStudy Material
Colorful paper art depicting elements related to a quiz on Behavioral Economics Knowledge Test.

Ready to dive into the fascinating world of behavioral economics? This interactive behavioral economics quiz challenges you with real-world scenarios and decision-making puzzles designed to sharpen your critical thinking. Whether you're a student of psychology, an economics enthusiast, or a professional curious about cognitive biases, this test offers valuable insights and immediate feedback. You can freely adapt each question in our editor to craft the perfect assessment or explore related Basic Economics Knowledge Quiz and the Behavioral Assessment Certification Quiz. Don't forget to check out all our quizzes for more engaging learning tools!

Which statement best describes the concept of loss aversion?
People only focus on gains in prospect evaluations.
People ignore losses when making decisions.
People prefer gains and losses equally.
People feel losses more intensely than equivalent gains.
Loss aversion refers to individuals experiencing the pain of losses more strongly than the pleasure of equivalent gains. This means that the disutility of losing is greater than the utility of gaining the same amount.
Which scenario illustrates the anchoring effect?
A person overestimates plane crash risks after hearing about a recent accident.
A car buyer sees a sticker price of $30,000 and negotiates down to $28,000, basing expectations on the original price.
An investor diversifies to minimize risk.
A smartphone user always keeps the factory settings.
Anchoring occurs when individuals rely too heavily on the first piece of information (the anchor) when making decisions. In this example, the sticker price sets an anchor that influences subsequent negotiations.
How does the framing effect influence decision making?
People avoid trying new products when options are framed negatively.
People change choices based on whether options are described as gains or losses.
People estimate probabilities based on vivid examples.
People stick with default choices regardless of framing.
The framing effect occurs when people respond differently to the same information depending on its presentation as gains or losses. This highlights that context and wording can systematically alter preferences.
When estimating the likelihood of events, the availability heuristic leads individuals to...
Base judgments on vivid or easily recalled examples.
Always overestimate small probabilities.
Rely primarily on statistical base rates.
Anchor on the first piece of information they receive.
The availability heuristic causes people to assess probability based on how easily examples come to mind. This can lead to overestimating the frequency of dramatic or memorable events.
What is a default nudge in behavioral economics?
A complex set of rules to enforce behavior.
A preselected option that applies if no alternative is chosen.
A guarantee of positive outcomes.
A financial penalty for poor choices.
A default nudge makes a specific choice the standard option, influencing behavior by taking advantage of inertia. Since many individuals stick with preselected options, defaults can significantly shift outcomes without restricting freedom.
Individuals exhibit the sunk cost fallacy when they...
Choose options based on similarity to prototypes.
Ignore past expenses in decision making.
Continue an endeavor because of prior investments, despite negative returns.
Prefer future gains over immediate rewards.
The sunk cost fallacy arises when people factor irrecoverable past costs into current decisions, leading them to persist in unprofitable activities. Rational decision making should consider only future costs and benefits.
According to prospect theory, the value function is characterized by being...
Steeper for gains than for losses.
Concave for gains, convex for losses, and steeper for losses than gains.
Linear throughout gains and losses.
Convex for gains and concave for losses.
Prospect theory's value function exhibits diminishing sensitivity: it is concave over gains and convex over losses. Moreover, loss aversion makes it steeper for losses than for equivalent gains.
The representativeness heuristic leads people to...
Overweigh vivid memories.
Stick with default options.
Use initial information as a reference point.
Judge probabilities by how similar an event is to a prototype.
The representativeness heuristic involves evaluating the likelihood of an event based on how closely it matches a typical case. This can result in neglecting relevant statistical information like base rates.
Which example best illustrates the endowment effect?
A consumer tries new products without hesitation.
A person insists on a higher selling price for a coffee mug they own than they would pay to buy it.
A buyer negotiates based on market averages.
An investor diversifies to avoid losses.
The endowment effect describes how ownership increases the perceived value of an item. Owners demand a higher price to give up a good than they would be willing to pay to acquire it.
Confirmation bias occurs when individuals...
Seek or interpret information that confirms existing beliefs.
Overestimate the importance of initial information.
Avoid making any decision under uncertainty.
Rely on random outcomes.
Confirmation bias leads people to favor information that aligns with their preconceptions and ignore contradictory evidence. This biases judgment and can reinforce erroneous beliefs.
Which nudge is most effective at increasing retirement savings participation?
Sending reminder emails monthly.
Providing detailed enrollment forms.
Automatically enrolling employees with the option to opt out.
Offering financial literacy workshops.
Automatic enrollment leverages inertia by making saving the default choice, substantially boosting participation rates. While education and reminders help, defaults have the strongest impact on behavior.
Choice overload refers to the phenomenon where…
Complex choices always improve outcomes.
Limited choices reduce engagement.
Too many options lead to decision paralysis and lower satisfaction.
Removing options increases cognitive load.
When individuals face an excessive number of options, they can experience anxiety and indecision, reducing the likelihood of making a choice. Moreover, satisfaction with the chosen option often decreases due to regret or second-guessing.
Hyperbolic discounting describes a tendency to…
Ignore temporal distance in decision making.
Discount future rewards at a constant exponential rate.
Always choose the largest reward regardless of timing.
Prefer smaller-sooner rewards over larger-later ones in the short term.
Hyperbolic discounting means that individuals disproportionately prefer immediate rewards over future ones, with discount rates declining over longer delays. This leads to time-inconsistent choices.
Status quo bias leads people to…
Prefer current options over changes, even if alternatives are better.
Evaluate choices solely on expected utility.
Constantly seek novel options.
Ignore default settings.
Status quo bias is the preference for the current state of affairs. Individuals often avoid changing due to perceived risks or effort, even when other options are objectively superior.
Holding decision-makers accountable for their choices can reduce bias because…
Anticipated justification prompts more thorough information processing.
Accountability increases confidence in gut instincts.
People rely more on heuristics when accountable.
It limits access to choice alternatives.
Accountability encourages decision-makers to deliberate and consider evidence carefully, reducing reliance on cognitive shortcuts. Knowing they must explain choices deters superficial reasoning.
Which choice pattern most clearly violates expected utility theory but is consistent with prospect theory?
Always risk-averse regardless of domain.
Being risk-averse for gains and risk-seeking for losses.
Indifferent between sure and risky outcomes.
Prefer expected value maximization in every scenario.
Expected utility theory predicts consistent risk preferences, but prospect theory allows people to be risk-averse with gains and risk-seeking with losses, reflecting value function curvature and loss aversion.
A nudge that respects autonomy while promoting healthy eating should…
Use punitive fines for unhealthy choices.
Enforce mandatory selection of healthy foods.
Hide healthier options among less healthy ones.
Use clear opt-out choices and transparent default placement.
Ethical nudges provide clear information and allow easy opt-out to preserve freedom of choice. Transparency and minimal coercion align with libertarian paternalism principles.
The decoy effect leverages behavioral biases by…
Randomly altering prices daily.
Introducing a third, less attractive option to make one of the original choices more appealing.
Penalizing the least chosen option.
Requiring additional information for premium options.
A decoy option is dominated by one alternative, shifting preferences toward that target. This exploits relative comparisons and loss aversion to influence decisions.
Mental accounting influences spending by causing individuals to…
Ignore budget constraints.
Spend evenly across all expense types.
View all money as perfectly fungible across categories.
Segregate money into separate budgets, treating funds differently based on source or purpose.
Mental accounting leads people to create cognitive categories for funds, such as 'entertainment' or 'savings', which affects how they allocate spending. This can result in suboptimal financial decisions due to artificial separations.
Which strategy is most effective at mitigating the planning fallacy?
Relying solely on expert intuition.
Omitting deadlines to reduce pressure.
Estimating time based on best-case scenarios.
Reference class forecasting, using data from similar past projects.
Reference class forecasting mitigates optimism bias by basing estimates on actual outcomes of comparable projects. This counteracts the tendency to underestimate task durations inherent in the planning fallacy.
0
{"name":"Which statement best describes the concept of loss aversion?", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Which statement best describes the concept of loss aversion?, Which scenario illustrates the anchoring effect?, How does the framing effect influence decision making?","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}

Learning Outcomes

  1. Analyse consumer choices shaped by behavioral biases
  2. Evaluate heuristics and their impact on economic decisions
  3. Identify common decision-making fallacies in practice
  4. Apply nudging principles to real-world scenarios
  5. Demonstrate understanding of prospect theory concepts
  6. Master strategies to mitigate cognitive biases in economics

Cheat Sheet

  1. Loss aversion - Imagine you'd rather avoid losing your favorite snack than win a new candy bar - that's loss aversion in action, where people feel losses more intensely than equal gains. It can make you cling to bad investments or avoid change even when the benefit is clear. Learn about Loss aversion
  2. Heuristics and shortcuts - Our brains love quick fixes called heuristics, like thinking air travel is super risky after seeing a shocking headline, even though it's quite safe. These mental shortcuts speed up decisions but sometimes trip us into bias-filled traps. Explore Behavioral Economics
  3. Sunk cost fallacy - Ever kept watching a movie you hated simply because you paid for the ticket? That's the sunk cost fallacy - sticking with choices due to past investments instead of future benefits. Spotting it helps you cut losses and make smarter calls. Dive into Sunk Costs
  4. Nudging principles - Nudges are gentle pushes - like defaulting folks into a retirement plan - to steer behavior without forcing choices. It's like setting a game to "easy mode" for good habits, boosting participation one nudge at a time. What Is Behavioral Economics?
  5. Prospect theory - Think of it as a roller coaster of feelings: gains and losses loom larger than simple probabilities and can lead us to make wild risk bets. Prospect theory unpacks why $100 feels way different to win than to lose - even if the numbers match. Discover Prospect theory
  6. Hyperbolic discounting - When you choose an ice cream now over a gym membership later, that's hyperbolic discounting - valuing small, instant rewards over bigger, delayed ones. Understanding this quirk helps you build better saving strategies and stick to long-term goals. Read about Hyperbolic discounting
  7. Bounded rationality - Our brains have limited RAM, so we often settle for "good enough" choices instead of perfect ones - this is bounded rationality. Think of it as picking a pizza joint quickly when you're starving and scrolling through endless menus isn't an option. Learn about Bounded rationality
  8. Framing effects - Would you pick "90% fat-free" or "10% fat"? Framing shapes our decisions, even if the facts stay the same. By tweaking how information is presented, marketers and policymakers can sway choices big time. See Framing effects
  9. Endowment effect - That mug you own feels like a treasure compared to an identical one you don't - this endowment effect makes us overvalue what's ours. It's why garage sales can be tricky negotiations! Understand Endowment effect
  10. Social preferences and fairness - We're more than profit-chasing robots; we care about fairness and will even sacrifice personal gain for equal outcomes. Grasping social preferences helps craft policies that everyone cheers for. Explore Social preferences
Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Finance Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker