Effective collaboration is generally used to resolve conflicts rather than being an inherent component of conflict. In contrast, opposing interests, competition for resources, and communication breakdowns typically contribute to conflicts.

Competition for scarce resources often creates an environment for conflict as parties vie for limited assets. The other options suggest cooperation and shared interests, which typically do not trigger conflict.

Escalation refers to the process in which a conflict grows in intensity, often due to misunderstandings or increasing emotional responses. It involves heightened actions and reactions rather than resolution.

A conflict requires that the involved parties perceive their goals or values to be incompatible. While physical violence or silence might occur in conflicts, they are not essential prerequisites for a conflict to exist.

When conflicts remain unresolved, they often lead to ongoing tension and may cause recurring disputes. This persistent tension damages relationships rather than fostering immediate harmony or eliminating differences.

Ineffective communication often exacerbates conflicts, as misinterpretations can fuel further disputes. While good communication can mitigate conflicts, it does not guarantee prevention or complete resolution without compromise.

A perceived power imbalance can cause tension by making parties feel that negotiations are skewed or unfair. This dynamic often intensifies conflicts and complicates the path to a mutually acceptable resolution.

Active listening and empathy help parties understand different perspectives and reduce misunderstandings. These strategies promote a calmer dialogue and pave the way for de-escalation.

Cultural differences may result in different communication styles and expectations, leading to misunderstandings. Recognizing these differences is essential to avoid misinterpretations that can escalate conflict.

Perception is critical in conflicts because it influences how events are interpreted. Even objective facts can be seen differently based on each party's perspective, thereby affecting the overall dynamics of the conflict.

Open dialogue fosters understanding and helps clarify misunderstandings, thereby reducing tension. In contrast, secrecy or isolation can contribute further to mistrust and conflict escalation.

Assuming negative intent without proper evidence can cause parties to become defensive and aggressive. This misunderstanding diverts attention from the actual issues and often leads to unnecessary escalation of the conflict.

Ignoring the opposing view prevents the essential exchange of ideas and can cause a conflict to worsen. Effective strategies like mediation, negotiation, and seeking common ground involve addressing and understanding differences.

When issues are left unaddressed, they tend to grow and compound over time. Allowing problems to fester without intervention makes it more difficult to resolve conflicts in the long run.

Identifying shared interests helps conflicting parties focus on commonalities rather than differences. This approach can pave the way for negotiations and a mutually acceptable resolution.

In complex conflicts, longstanding biases and unequal power dynamics can interfere with a mediator's ability to remain completely impartial. This challenge is compounded by the emotional and historical factors involved, making neutrality difficult to sustain.

Escalated conflicts often result in prolonged distrust and can fracture communal ties. Long-term impacts include social fragmentation and difficulty rebuilding relationships even after the conflict subsides.

Historical and cultural contexts offer essential insights into the origins and evolution of conflicts. They shape how parties perceive and react to situations, making them critical for accurately analyzing and addressing conflicts.

Transformative conflict resolution goes beyond merely ending a dispute by addressing the core relational issues. This approach can lead to a fundamental change in how parties interact, fostering long-term peace.

External intervention can sometimes overlook the intricate local and cultural nuances that fuel a conflict. This lack of deep understanding may result in solutions that are not tailored to the specific needs of the community, potentially worsening the situation.