Fake news is designed to mislead and often employs sensational tactics, not verified facts. Option 2 is incorrect because verified facts are a hallmark of legitimate news.

Misinformation is typically inaccurate information shared without harmful intent. This distinguishes it from disinformation, which is intentionally deceptive.

Fake news is often produced with the intention of deceiving and manipulating public opinion, frequently for political or financial gain. Option B correctly identifies this motive.

Fake news frequently employs emotional and sensational headlines to grab attention and provoke strong reactions. Option B best captures this tactic.

Verifying the source of an article is crucial for assessing its credibility. Trusted sources are more likely to provide accurate and reliable news.

Misinformation typically spreads unintentionally, while disinformation is purposefully crafted to deceive. This distinction is essential for understanding how false information circulates.

An overly sensational headline with insufficient evidence is a common indicator of fake news. It is designed to evoke an emotional response rather than inform objectively.

Cross-referencing a news story with established, reputable sources is the most effective method to verify its accuracy. This practice helps confirm whether the information is corroborated by multiple trusted outlets.

Digital tools such as fact-checkers and reverse image searches assist in verifying claims and sources. These technologies empower readers to distinguish credible news from fake content.

Confirmation bias leads people to accept information that supports their existing views, regardless of its truthfulness. This cognitive bias is a significant factor in why fake news can spread so effectively.

Clickbait is designed primarily to attract clicks and drive website traffic, which in turn increases advertising revenue. Option B accurately reflects the commercial motive behind clickbait.

The publication date provides context about the timeliness of the news, helping readers assess whether the information is still current and relevant. This is a key factor in evaluating the accuracy of any news story.

Recognizing bias in a news story is crucial because it highlights whether the information is presented fairly or skewed. Option A is correct as it emphasizes the importance of balanced reporting.

Manipulated images in fake news are intended to add a veneer of credibility and distract readers from the lack of factual backing. Option A best explains how such visuals can mislead an audience.

Fact-checking websites are designed to verify the accuracy of news stories by comparing claims against reliable evidence. They serve as a critical tool in the fight against the spread of fake news.

Algorithmic biases on social media often prioritize content based on engagement, which can inadvertently amplify unverified information. This increases the reach of fake news regardless of its credibility.

Reverse image search is a powerful tool that allows users to track where an image first appeared online. It helps verify if an image has been manipulated or used out of context in fake news.

Even well-produced fake news can influence public opinion by leveraging cognitive biases and presenting persuasive narratives. Option B correctly explains how complexity and emotional appeal can overcome factual inaccuracies.

Media literacy education empowers individuals to analyze and verify the news they consume. This critical approach reduces susceptibility to misleading information and fake news.

The echo chamber effect occurs when individuals are exposed only to opinions similar to their own, reinforcing their existing beliefs. This isolation makes it easier for fake news to be accepted without critical examination.